Shapie, M. N. M (1,2) & Razak, M. H. M. (1)
1.Fakulti Sains Sukan dan Rekreasi, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor.
ABSTRACT
This is study describing the
relationship between winning and losing in silat 28th 2015 sea games Singapore
during competitive matches like quarterfinal, semi-final and final and profile
of elite silat exponent of a pencak silat. This study had been analyse between
four different match with 4 different countries. The purpose behind this review
is to analysis the of silat olahraga among Malaysian Silat's group at the Sea
Games 2015. A video recording during the match was use for the analysis. Three
skill involved in Pencak Silat including hit target, hit somewhere else, and
miss opponent. Generally, pencak silat is same likes the others of martial art
which used body posture and technique in performance but only different in term
of their motion categories.
INTRODUCTION
Pencak silat is a special type of
martial art fighting established in Malay culture, which extends crosswise over
Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei Darussalam, the Southern Philippines and
Southern Thailand, and different spots where popular who talk in the Malay
dialect and allude to a typical Malay family line can be found.
Pencak silat is additionally can be
a lesson for understudy to enhance their abilities. One of pencak silat course
objectives is to enhance confident level. One of learning procedure is
amusement approach which is it include energizing, fun, and propelling for
understudies. It makes inclusion of understudies in the class, bigger fervor to
enhance and study new propelled aptitudes, and rousing the understudies to perform
well in class.
Motion
of analysis for silat is punch, kick,
block, topple, sweep, catch and dodge.
Past review demonstrates that the movement profile during activity time.
According to Shapie, Oliver, O'Donoghue, and Tong (2009), the nature of work periods
inside any battle sports relies on upon the recurrence, volume and kind of the
action being performed. The target of this review is to depict the abilities
required between the champ and washout and in addition to decide the variable
that impact the winner to win.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A video recording of definite match
Class E and H men at Sea Games in Singapore 2015 utilized for the analysis. Two
pesilat is included from various group or nation. This match comprise of three
rounds, which is two minutes for every round and one minute rest between each
round.This notation involved various skills such as punch, kick, block, catch,
topple and sweep. Usage of Statistical
Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) to calculate the statistical analysis and result. The video
is repeated at least two times so the data can be taken properly. The frequency
was taken as data to be analysed.
Motion categories
Silat
exponent’s motions were coded into 14 different types of categories and were
defined as follows:
Punch:
The
punch ‘tumbuk’ attack is done by a hand with a closed fist hitting the target.
In silat punching is often used to fight the opponent. It can be a straight
punch ‘tumbuk lurus’ or uppercut ‘sauk’ to the exponent body’s.
Kick:
The
kick ‘tendang / terajang’ is an attacking movement which is performed with one
leg or two legs simultaneously. A kick can be aimed at any target. It can be
front kick ‘ tendang depan’, side-kick ‘depak’ or semi-circular side kick
‘tendang lengkar’.
Block:
The
blocking movements begin with the posture position ‘sikap pasang’: the exponent
stands straight with his hands around his body or close to his chest. Blocking
or parrying ‘tangkisan’ can be done using arms, elbows and legs with the
purpose to block off or striking back at any attack.
Catch:
The
catch ‘tangkapan’ is done by using the hand to ob struct the opponent from
carrying out an attack. The silat exponent is able to prevent himself from
being attacked by pointing the attack which he has caught to another direction.
A catch which twists or drags the opponent is forbidden. Also, a catch which
could break the part which is being held such as the leg and waist is also
forbidden. These regulations exist to protect the silat exponent’s.
Topple:
There
are various ways of toppling down one’s opponent. For example, a silat exponent
‘pesilat’ can either push, shove the opponent’s back leg from the bag or from
the side, shove, hit, kick, strike or punch to make the opponent lose his
balance. Every fall is considered valid as long as the silat exponent topples
his opponent down without wrestling or he is able to overpower the opponent
whom he has brought down.
Sweep:
Swiping
‘sapuan’ involves attacking an opponent’s leg which are on the ground to
unstabilise him and bring down to the ground. A silat exponent can perform this
attacking movement either with his right or left leg, Hence, front sweep
‘sapuan depan’ is done by swinging the leg to the front to push an opponent’s
front leg, while back sweep ‘sapuan belakang’ is carried out by swinging the
leg backward to hit the back leg.
Evade/Dodge:
The
evade ‘elakan’ technique is carried out by silat exponent when he tries to
evade an attack. This technique does not require the silat exponent to touch
the opponent in fending off the attack. They are many ways of carrying out his
defensive movement such as dodging ‘gelek’, retreat ‘mundur’, evasion to the
side ‘elak sisi’, bending ‘elak serung’, jumping ‘lonjak’, ducking ‘susup’ and
etc..
Self-Release:
Self-release
‘lepas tangkapan’ technique is a technique to unlock any clinch or catch from
an opponent.
Block and Punch:
The
blocking technique is used to block any hand or leg attack from the opponent
and followed by counter attack using the hand to punch the opponent.
Block and Kick:
The
blocking technique is used to block any hand or leg attack from the opponent
and followed by counter attack using the leg to kick the opponent.
Block and Sweep:
The
blocking technique is used to block any hand or leg attack from the opponent
and followed by counter attack using sweeping technique to the opponent.
Fake Punch:
An
action which a silat exponent intends to confuse the opponent using a fake punch
to break his opponent’s defensive posture.
Fake Kick:
An
action which a silat exponent intends to confuse the opponent using a fake kick
to break his opponent defensive posture.
Others:
Both
silat exponents are either in posture position ‘sikap pasang’ or coming close
to each other using silat step pattern ‘pola langkah’.
All
the activities are considered high intensity except for others which at that
time both silat exponents are in low intensity periods.
STATISTICAL
ANALYSIS AND RESULT
1.
Men’s
70kg Class E Final (Malaysia Win)
Group Statistics
|
|||||
Group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Std. Error Mean
|
|
Score
|
Malaysia
|
3
|
26.3333
|
15.69501
|
9.06152
|
Vietnam
|
3
|
23.3333
|
10.78579
|
6.22718
|
TABLE
1
Hit Target
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Miss Target
|
Total
|
|
Malaysia
|
14
|
21
|
44
|
79
|
Vietnam
|
11
|
28
|
31
|
68
|
2. Men’s
85kg Class H Final (Malaysia Lost)
Group Statistics
|
|||||
Group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Std. Error Mean
|
|
Score
|
Malaysia
|
3
|
22.3333
|
14.29452
|
8.25295
|
Indonesia
|
3
|
24.6667
|
13.86843
|
8.00694
|
TABLE
2
Hit Target
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Miss Target
|
Total
|
|
Malaysia
|
10
|
19
|
38
|
67
|
Indonesia
|
13
|
21
|
40
|
74
|
3.
Men’s 70kg Class E Semi Final (Malaysia win)
Group Statistics
|
|||||
Group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Std. Error Mean
|
|
Score
|
Malaysia
|
3
|
26.6667
|
15.53491
|
8.96908
|
Singapore
|
3
|
23.6667
|
14.57166
|
8.41295
|
TABLE
3
Hit Target
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Miss Target
|
Total
|
|
Malaysia
|
14
|
22
|
44
|
80
|
Singapore
|
12
|
19
|
40
|
71
|
4.
Men’s 70kg Class E Quarter Final (Malaysia
win)
Group Statistics
|
|||||
Group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Std. Error Mean
|
|
Score
|
Malaysia
|
3
|
25.0000
|
13.00000
|
7.50555
|
Indonesia
|
3
|
22.3333
|
14.46836
|
8.35331
|
TABLE 4
Hit Target
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Miss Target
|
Total
|
|
Malaysia
|
18
|
17
|
40
|
75
|
Indonesia
|
13
|
15
|
39
|
67
|
DISCUSSION
Table
1 demonstrates match Men's 70kg Class E Final Vietnam Versus (Malaysia win). In
this match, the winner is Malaysia. Athlete of Malaysia more forceful than the
athelete Vietnam. In this games, both hopefuls of this competitor more watchful
while doing some movement in of the fact that each of the contender need to hit
focus to their rivals. In this way, during the low force movement both of the
silat examples were considered to perform low action activities, for example,
approaching each other utilizing silat step pattern "pola langkah" or
"sikap pasang" pose. Other than that, the movement, for example,
punching, kicking, blocking, dodging, catching, swiping and toppling is an
anaerobic sources add to the metabolic requests amid the work spent performing
high force action.
Table
2 shows match Men’s - 85kg Class H Indonesia Versus Malaysia. In this match,
the winner is Indonesia. Basically, both contestants of this countries also
show a good match. It can be assumed
that punching, kicking, blocking, dodging, catching, swiping and toppling is an
anaerobic sources contribute to the metabolic demands during the work spent
performing high intensity activity. During the low intensity activity both of
the silat exponents were deemed to be performing low activity actions such as
coming close to each other using silat step pattern “pola langkah” or “sikap
pasang” posture.
Table
3 shows match Men’s 70kg Class E Semi-final Singapore Versus Malaysia. In this
match, the winner is Malaysia. . Basically, both contestants of this countries
also show a good match. They was comprised of kick and punch actions. In this
games, both hopefuls of this competitor more watchful while doing some movement
in of the fact that each of the contender need to hit focus to their rivals. In
this way, during the low force movement both of the silat examples were
considered to perform low action activities, for example, approaching each
other utilizing silat step pattern "pola langkah" or "sikap
pasang" pose. Other than that, the movement, for example, punching,
kicking, blocking, dodging, catching, swiping and toppling is an anaerobic
sources add to the metabolic requests amid the work spent performing high force
action.
Table
4 shows match Men’s Class E Quarterfinals Indonesia Versus Malaysia which
Malaysia is win. In this match, the winner is Malaysia. Basically, both
contestants of this countries show a good match. . It can be assumed that punching, kicking,
blocking, dodging, catching, swiping and toppling is an anaerobic sources
contribute to the metabolic demands during the work spent performing high
intensity activity. During the low intensity activity both of the silat
exponents were deemed to be performing low activity actions such as coming
close to each other using silat step pattern “pola langkah” or “sikap pasang”
posture.
CONCLUSION
The conclusion, both Class have a
good performance in their match. The athlete that lost the match have to expand
their accuracy during match and preparing so they can perform better in up at
coming competition. As indicated by all the video, Malaysia group more probable
utilize clear in their match particularly for Class E. We can see from the
outcome that during the match against Singapore and Vietnam, the athlete have
the high capability of used miss target. For Class H more probable used
punching and kicking. In addition, Class H are less used block and letting the
opponent effectively getting punch, kick, topple and sweep.
RECOMMENDATION
As
we know that occasionally, individuals commit errors and people are not perfect
but rather we can practice to be the best. Silat athletes should practice more
on their target and technique to improve their performance especially on catch,
dodge, punch, kick, sweep, and topple. After that, silat is a martial art, we
should prepare longer to improved the technique and the most important thing is
the strenght of the athlete so they can't sweep or topple. Besides, video
investigation can be a recognize the athlete weakness.
REFERENCE
1. Shapie,
M. N. M., Oliver, J., O’Donoghue, P., & Tong, R. (2014). Fitness
characteristics of youth silat performers. Journal
of Sports Science and Medicine, 1, 147-155.
2. Abdul
Rashid Aziz, Benedict Tan, Kong Chuan Teh (2002). Physiological Responses
during
Matches and Profile of Elite Pencak Silat Exponentst. Journal of Sports Science
and Medicine, Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 01, 147 – 155
3. Stark,
S. (2008). Pencak silat pertempuran: Stepping from stone to stone: Sean Stark.
6. http://www.jssm.org/research.php?id=jssm-01-147.xml
8.
O'Donoghue, P., Rudkin, S., Bloomfield,
J., Powell, S., Cairns, G., Dunkerley, A., et al. (2005). Repeated work
activity in english fa premier league soccer. International Journal of
Performance Analysis in Sport, 5(2), 46-57.
9.
Parnabas,
V., Shapie, M. N. M., & Parnabas, J. (2015). Level of drugs usage and sport
performance in malay silat. Ido Movement
for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology, 15(2), 45-51.
11. Shapie, M. N.
M., Oliver, J., O’Donoghue, P., & Tong, R. (2014). Fitness characteristics
of youth silat performers. Journal of
Sports Science and Medicine, 1, 147-155.
12. Pencak Silat Tanding Men's Class E Final VIE vs MAS (Day 9) |
28th SEA Games Singapore 2015
13. Pencak Silat Tanding Men's Class H Final INA vs MAS (Day 9) |
28th SEA Games Singapore 2015
14. Pencak Silat Tanding Men's Class E
Semi-Final SIN vs MAS (Day 8) | 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015
15. Pencak Silat Tanding Class E Men's Indonesia vs Malaysia (Day
7) | 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015